Nigel wing
· 2024-07-25 16:18 UTC
Well, that explains a lot. Thank you for the detailed article
Subscribe to GEN
Login to GEN
Add a Comment
BT started broadband in the UK in 2000/2001 with ADSL, which could provide up to 10Mbps but almost never did instead being limited to 0.5Mbps, 1Mbps and 2Mbps. This limit was primarily due to the terrible state of the cabling in and above ground which had been neglected for decades by BT, much of which hadn't been replaced since the war, and again much of which was aluminium instead of copper because it was much cheaper. However, compared to dial-up, even 512k was a step up and 2Mbps was massive.
ADSL2 began rollout in 2003/2004 by BT, which increased reliability somewhat but didn't increase speed by very much. At this time BT began a renovation of the cable infrastructure and began replacing 50 year old cables with new, albeit slowly.
In 2008 BT (now openreach) began upgrading equipment to ADSL2+, which promised a massive speed increase to a max of 24Mbps, although again almost no one achieved this with most floating somewhere between 10Mbps and 20Mbps. ADSL2+ was introduced because of its ability to operate with poor line quality to improve speeds, but it was shortlived with early FTTC trials starting in 2009 as a way to side-step the still terrible cabling in the ground.
In 2010 Openreach launched FTTC and began the roll out, which promised as much as 80Mbps, but this was initially only provided as 40Mbps simply because this was achievable, whereas 80Mbps was never achievable. FTTC used fibre optic from the exchange to the cabinet, which was the LONG leg of the journey greatly reducing the length of copper (or aluminium) to the premises. By 2012 Openreach was installing *new* wires from the cabinet to the premises for new circuits where existing wire was poor and this meant that the maximum speed was increased to 40Mbps with some customers actually achieving that.
In 2010 Openreach launched FTTP which initially was only in select area's and only for commercial use. Later that same year FTTP was extended to some residential premises in select areas. The rollout was slow to start primarily due to the expense of the equipment and skills gap to install it, but by 2016 Openreach made the commitment to rollout FTTP over any other technology, solidifying this in 2018 by making FTTP the only broadband available in new cabinets.
In 2017 Openreach announced G.Fast, which further enhanced FTTC with speeds up to 300Mbps, and it was initially decided to roll this out in area's where FTTP not immediately viable, or possible, but by the end of 2018 Openreach was scalling back the rollout bringing it to a halt in 2019/2020. In 2023 Openreach officially canned G.Fast and no longer offer it as a service. Existing services will be phased out as FTTP becomes available.
ADSL (Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line 1) used a technology called DMT (Discrete Multitone) modulation to transmit data over standard copper telephone lines. Here's how ADSL1 worked:
ADSL1 represented a significant improvement over dial-up internet, offering faster speeds and the ability to use the phone and internet simultaneously. However, its performance was limited by factors such as line quality, distance from the exchange, and the number of users sharing the connection.
ADSL2 (Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line 2) was an improved version of the original ADSL technology, offering several key enhancements:
It's worth noting that while ADSL2 offered these improvements, the actual performance still depended heavily on factors like distance from the exchange and line quality. In some cases, particularly for users far from exchanges, ADSL1 could still perform better than ADSL2.
ADSL2 equipment was designed to be backwards compatible with ADSL1, allowing for easier upgrades and compatibility with existing infrastructure.
FTTC (Fibre to the Cabinet) is a broadband technology that combines fibre optic and copper cables to deliver high-speed internet. By using new fibre-optic to carry data to the cabinet, only the much shorter distance from the cabinet to the premises was copper.
In FTTC the fibre optic from the exchange to the cabinet was initially at 1Gbps, later 2Gbps and then 10Gbps, and there could be more than one fibre if needed.
The "last mile" section from the cabinet to the premises was often installed fresh even if there was existing cable simply to avoid the poor quality existing cabling, and even with fresh cable there maximum speed was still limited to 80Mbps even though the equipment in the cabinet could achieve 120Mbps if so configured. It was felt that 80Mbps was more than sufficient and that having too many speeds would complicate ordering and billing. When you consider that being able to order 20Mbps, 40Mbps, 60Mbps, 80Mbps, 100Mbps and 120Mbps, and then having customers not achieving that speed would mean near constant downgrades and credits/refunds which would make it unworkable, instead going for 40Mbps or 80Mbps and you get what you get.
The analogue "last mile" section of the circuit used VDSL (Very high bit rate DSL) which again improved on ADSL2/2+ by
Feature | VDSL | ADSL2+ |
Maximum Download Speed | Up to 52 Mbps (VDSL), 100-300 Mbps (VDSL2) | Up to 24 Mbps |
Maximum Upload Speed | Up to 16 Mbps (VDSL), 50-100 Mbps (VDSL2) | Up to 1.4 Mbps |
Frequency Range | 25 kHz to 12 MHz | Up to 2.2 MHz |
Distance Sensitivity | High (best performance within 1,000 meters) | Moderate (effective up to 5,000 meters) |
Modulation | DMT (Discrete Multi-Tone) | DMT (Discrete Multi-Tone) |
Deployment | Requires fiber to the cabinet (FTTC) | Uses existing copper lines from exchange |
G.fast is a broadband technology that enhances the performance of existing copper lines by using higher frequencies, typically 106Mhz to 212Mhz, and can technically deliver up to 1Gbps over short copper lines, although in practise its more reasonable to expect around 200Mbps. G.Fast is only effective on short lines of 500m or less, after which it becomes incresingly less effective. G.fast was the next logical progression of DSL technology, but is no longer avaialble with Openreach focusing their efforts on FTTP.
Openreach's FTTP (Fibre to the Premises) technology involves running fibre optic cables directly from the exchange to individual homes and businesses. This completely avoids any existing wiring and of course removes any speed restrictions based on this. FTTP currently provides speeds up to 1Gbps, but is technically able to provide speeds up to 30Gbps or more. There is no dependency on having cabinets in the street or wires in the ground and since its a 'passive' network, the actual cabinets that are needed can be tiny in size, and actually are often installed on telegraph poles with a long term plan to remove street cabinets.
Even though technically FTTP can provide significant speeds, in the UK, Openreach heavily contends customers so that, a single 2.5Gbps fibre port (OLT) is shared between 32 customers, and sometimes as many as 64 customers. Openreach are upgrading OLT's to increased this to 10Gbps between 32 customers (up to 64 customers) but this isn't easily tracked.
Regardless, the actual maximum speed at the customer's ONT (Optical Network Termination) depends on how much contention there is, the capabilities of the OLT/PON and ONT, and the limits imposed by the broadband vendor. Just becase you're connected to a 10Gbps PON doesn't mean you can have 10Gbps or 2Gbps or any other combination. The original ONT's provided by Openreach can only support speeds up to 1Gbps.
Have you ever wondered how you can have broadband from GEN, and BT using the same infrastructure?
Its actually quite simple. The Openreach infrastructure is responsible for data transmission between the exchange and the customer, once at the exchange traffic is transferred over BT's backhaul network to your broadband providers POP (where they interconnect to BT's network) and from there the traffic flows over the providers network. Mostly. In some cases, there are hybrid peering agreements where broadband traffic terminates on one vendors network and is then routed to another, and possibly another. BT's WBMC Shared is an example of this and can be significantly cheaper than WBC. Hybrid peering increases performace by routing internet traffic directly to the internet bypassing the vendors network, and then only hitting the vendors network for vendor specific services, like email, SDWAN, SSO, etc.
For broadband providers with a large enough wallet, it is possible to circumvent the BT Backhaul network and transfer data directly to your own network by having a network termination in the exchange. This is expensive, but provides greater flexibility and control. Some providers started to rollout LLU during ADSL2, but as BT reduced the price of backhaul and offered more 'options' it became less favourable.
Smart Traffic shaping has enabled residential broadband providers to 'manage' customers that are placing a higher than average demand on their network by delaying, slowing, or factoring excessive traffic to maintain an average service level. Residential broadband providers contend connections more, meaning that customers sharing a circuit 'feel' the impact of a heavy user more than businesses. Let's assume that a 2.5Gbps fibre circuit is shared between 32 households, then that doesn't mean that each will get 78Mbps of bandwith, because traffic isn't like that. Let's assume that every one of those 32 customers has the full 1Gbps service, and that two of them are downloading torrents at the full 1Gbps at the same time. That will means that 500Mbps is all that's left for the other 30 customers. Its rarely like this, but you start to see how contention can cause laggy performance especially at those peak times. Sharing only 2.5Gbps between 32 1Gbps circuits means that if everyone was downloading at the same time, they'd each only get 8% of their purchased bandwidth. I know, but in reality even contending at 32:1 performs 'ok' in a residential setting, and traffic shaping successfully slows down those heavy users to allocate bandwidth more fairly.
A Broadband Vendor, when using Openreach, and other networks like Virgin, are able to specify the contention as a factor of the OLT. That is, whilst residential vendors are happy at 32:1 or more contention, business vendors are (generally) not, but we can't all afford to provide 1:1 for £100/pcm. Instead we try and work to a more sensible contention giving each business a far larger share of the 2.5Gbps OLT, and we can reduce this further if needs be, anything up to 1:1 assuming the customer is willing to pay for it and the vendor can support it. However, broadband and FTTP is not the most suitable service for businesses who need low contention, low latency circuits, and private circuits fit this use case much better. With a private circuit you're getting 1:1 and if you order a 1Gbps private circuit, then all 1Gbps is yours to do with as you please. Private circuits are also synchronous, meaning that its 1Gbps download and 1Gbps upload which again suits business use cases better than FTTP which is asynchronous.
Business vendors do not generally use traffic shaping, although they do use hybrid routing, not only to route internet traffic away from their core networks, but also to configure and establish software defined WAN, or SDWAN, which is essentially a 'virtual' private circuit between a companies sites, allowing traffic to flow as-if they were directly connected. SD-WAN, which is essentially a hardware based VPN is quite a popular service especially for companies with more than one site, joining their LAN's allows for file, data, voice, and video sharing between distinct buildings.
Business customers NEED better service than the usual 2 to 5 days to repair a broadband circuit in the UK, and to achieve this we, and any other good business ISP has to pay Openreach (or Virgin etc) a monthly fee for every circuit to jump the queue for faults. I'm not going to say what this charge is because it changes regularly but its not insignificant over the life of a connection. Another apporach is disperate connectivity which is achieved by bringing in one circuit over, for example, Openreach and another one from, for example, Virgin Media. Both circuits are delivered to a router capable of load balancing and fault tollerance which then ensures that internet connectivity will be maintained if either circuit fails. This is more expensive than the queue jumping charge, but it guarantees connectivity even in the event of a failure, which for some companies is worth the extra. We, for example use routers that can handle 2 circuits as standard, but can supply equipment capable of supporting 4 or 8 circuits, load balanced with redundancy if needed, and this sort of service is what sets business ISPs apart from residential ISPs who also sell to business.
Openreach, is still a BT company, and its part of BT, meaning that BT who themselves provide broadband have a distinct advantage over everyone else, even though they pretend they don't. Since Openreach is the only way to provide broadband to the majority of customers, all broadband vendors are forced to use them unless alternatives are available. That means we're forced to pay the same price as everyone else which reduces competition significantly.
There are alternatives, some of which have significant coverage like Virgin Media, and others who are slowly growing, and of course 5G promised broadband speeds through the airwaves. Ultimately, for any one broadband provision there are generally several options, which is why GEN, for example, don't have a online ordering process for broadband. Instead we take the address details and then a specialise will look at all the options for a given location, which involves looking at openreach capacity, virgin, 4GLTE, 5G, Satellite, private circuit and other technologies like WiMax or Microwave, and with smart equipment several of these can be combined to provide even more bandwidth with automatic redundancy for high uptime and service levels. As the market continues to diverge, business broadband will become more segmented with some providers sticking with Openreach whilst others readily embrace emerging networks providing more choice and performance.
ADSL, ADSL2/2+, and VDSL involve transmitting data over copper (or otherwise) wires in the ground, or above ground. This analogue section severly limits the maximum speed but these technologies are adept at handling poor quality lines to obtain the best possible rates.
FTTP involves fibre optic from the exchange to the customer, no boxes, no copper (or otherwise) just fibre. This is far more reliable, far faster and is much cheaper to install and maintain. In the future FTTP will continue to increase bandwidth and broadband vendors will keep pace with faster packages
Openreach is working hard to withdraw ALL wires in the ground/above ground as soon as possible, and they are doing this in several ways.
This approach is effective, but not really in the spirit of things. If they want people to move, offer it for free, don't force people into it by making the other options untenable. In my opinion.
This FAQ hopefully answers some questions, and I can only speak to our own experience with BTW, WBC and Openreach, other providers may have other experiences, and some providers use API's to integrate with BTW which can limit their abilities to perform some functions, so please consider this.
In 2024, we are already being included in Openreach briefings regarding high speeds and improved technology, and indeed the fibre being deployed between the exchange and premises, which is single mode, is technically capable of carrying 1Pbps leaving room for much expansion. The proposed future servics are suggesting 1.8Gbps will be possible for residential customers at some point in the medium term, and for business customers there's a possibility of 10Gbps, but we'll have to wait and see how this shapes up in the coming months and years.
With virtually limitless potential for Openreach fibre, and the proliferation of alternatives such as Wimax, Microwave, 5G, Satellite and private broadband infrastrucutre, the future for UK consumers and businesses alike is bright.
GEN, as the UK's oldest Business ISP has been involved in the connectivity business for 30+ years, and we are NOT limited to Openreach. If you need flexible reliable connectivity with a service level guarantee then feel free to ask us for a quotation (Services / Connectivity from the top Menu).
Nigel wing
· 2024-07-25 16:18 UTC
Well, that explains a lot. Thank you for the detailed article
--- This content is not legal or financial advice & Solely the opinions of the author ---
Index v1.028 Standard v1.114 Module v1.062 Copyright © 2024 GEN Partnership. All Rights Reserved, Content Policy, E&OE. ^sales^ 0115 933 9000 Privacy Notice 277 Current Users, 594 Hits